Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00933
Original file (PD2012 00933.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY
CASE NUMBER: PD1200933 SEPARATION DATE: 20030222
BOARD DATE: 20130307


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Soldier, SPC/E-4(77F/Petroluem Supply Specialist), medically separated for a lumbar spine condition. He injured his back while lifting in 2001, and was subsequently diagnosed with non-surgical degenerative disc disease (ddd). He did not respond adequately to conservative measures to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The condition, characterized as “recurrent chronic low back pain without radiculopathy” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The Informal PEB (ipeb) adjudicated the lumbar spine condition as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with that disability rating.


CI CONTENTION: The application states, “Rating should be higher or equivalent to VA’s rating decision. Army rated service member at 10%. VA rated service member at 40% for the same condition found unfit.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board wishes to clarify that the scope of its review as defined in Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 6040.44 Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2) is limited to those conditions which were determined by the PEB to be specifically unfitting for continued military service; or, when requested by the CI, those condition(s) “identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB.” The rating for the unfitting lumbar spine condition is addressed below; and, no additional conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service PEB – Dated 20021119
 VA - Based on Service Treatment Record (STR) VARD 20040224
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Back Pain 5299-5295 10% Back Injury 5237 NSC* STR
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other X 0 STR
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 0%*
* Original VA rating decision did not service connect (NSC) the condition because of incomplete records; but did so after complete records were received. The subsequent 40% rating (VARD 20090321), however, was derived from a VA examination performed 20090210 ( 6 years after separation ).


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the sentiment expressed in the CI’s application regarding the significant impairment with which his service-incurred condition continues to burden him. The Board wishes to clarify that it is subject to the same laws for disability entitlements as those under which the Disability Evaluation System (DES) operates. The DES has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws (Title 38, United States Code). The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of separation.

Chronic Low Back Pain . The narrative summary (NARSUM) notes the CI sustained a lifting injury in March 2001 causing severe low back pain (LBP). He recovered and was well for a time but had the return of frequent LBP increased by exercise. The pain was across the low back without radiation to the lower extremities. The CI reported two episodes of bowel incontinence, but no neurological abnormalities were noted in the emergency room. Lumbosacral X-ray and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a transitional vertebra with sacralization of L5. There was mild disc bulging at this level with without nerve compression. At the MEB evaluation on 16 October 2002, 4 months prior separation, the CI reported LBP and numbness. The MEB exam described back range-of-motion (ROM) as “forward bending with reach to within 60 cm of the floor” left and right lateral bending was 30 degrees (normal 30 degrees). There was muscle spasm on the left greater than the right with all motions. There was pain to palpation of the lumbar spine. Straight leg raising (SLR) “in stance” caused muscle spasm, but seated straight leg raising did not. The CI lifted both legs from the table without difficulty but grimaced. Bringing his knees to his chest and his chin to his chest caused increased LBP. Reflexes, sensation, and motor strength were normal. There were no sciatic stretch signs present. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam performed in March 2009 ( 6 years after separation) the CI reported that his back pain without radiation was worse. He reported flare- ups of moderate severity every one to 2 months that lasted one to 2 days. He reported being able to walk up to three miles. The spine exam showed a normal gait without spasm. Muscle tone, reflexes and strength were all normal. Range of thoracolumbar (TL) flexion was 37 degrees (normal 90 degrees) with objective pain with repetitive motion. SLR was reported as positive bilaterally.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB rated 5299-5295 (analogous to lumbosacral strain) at 10% (characteristic pain on motion). In 2009 the VA rated, retroactive to the date of separation, as 5242 (degenerative arthritis of the spine) at 10% and increased to 20% effective October 2008. The Board must apply the VASRD rating criteria in effect on the date of the CI’s separation and the Board did so. The Board deliberated coding as 5295 at 10% or 20%; or using 5292 (limited motion of the lumbar spine). There were many visits for back pain with spasm noted in the service treatment record (STR) and at the MEB exam there was muscle spasm, greater on the left than right, and pain with motion noted, with no evidence of radiculopathy. The Board opined that the CI most nearly met the criteria for the 20% moderate rating of code 5295 with muscle spasm on forward bending, and painful motion. The Board considered that the NARSUM noted a thoracic spine abnormality and tenderness that may have added to the back ROM limitation; however there is no thoracic ROM evidence in the record. Therefore, the Board adjudged that affording the benefit of reasonable doubt to the CI, the limitation of “can reach to within 60 centimeters of the floor” was consistent with a moderate limitation of lumbar ROM. The Board surmised that coding with either 5295 or 5292 provided a path to a 20% rating and chose 5295. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% coded 5299-5295 for the chronic back pain condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the chronic back pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5299-5295 IAW VASRD §4.71a. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Back Pain Condition 5299-5295 20%
COMBINED
 20%

The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120620, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




                                   
                 
                  Physical Disability Board of Review


 SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-Z),


SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for AR20130005073 (PD201200933)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                     
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-01020

    Original file (PD-2012-01020.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-Separation) – All Effective Date 20020906 Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam Chronic Low Back Pain w/out Neurologic Abnormality 5299-5295 10% Lower Back Condition with Bulging Disc at L4/L5 and Radiculopathy 5293 20% 20021010 .No Additional MEB/PEB Entries. The 2002 Veterans’ Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) coding and rating standards for the spine, which were in effect at the time of separation, were changed in late September 2002 regarding...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01278

    Original file (PD2012 01278.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB coded the back condition utilizing the 2002 VASRD rating rules as 5299-5295, analogous to lumbosacral strain and citing DoDI 1332.39 and AR 635-40.The VA rating of 40% was under the current VASRD §4.71a rating code of 5242 (degenerative arthritis of the spine) which was not in effect at the time of the CI’s date of separation.The spine specific VA examination (6 months after separation) demonstrated significantly worse symptoms and ROMs than the general VA exam (near separation) and...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00458

    Original file (PD 2012 00458.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The lumbar spine condition, characterized as “myofascial low back pain (LBP) syndrome” and “degenerative arthritis of the lumbar spine,” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB).The MEB also identified and forwarded one other condition“moderate obstructive sleep apnea,” as medically acceptable,IAW AR 40-501. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination. Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01929

    Original file (PD2012 01929.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board must use the VASRD coding and rating standards which were in effect at the time of the CI’s separation. Physical Disability Board of Review I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01409

    Original file (PD 2012 01409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded no other conditions for Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication. The PEB rated the chronic mechanical LBP 10% under the VASRD code for lumbar strain in effect at the time citing characteristic pain on motion without neurologic abnormality or documented chronic paravertebral muscle spasms on repeated examinations. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, DAF Acting Director Physical Disability...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00937

    Original file (PD 2013 00937.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation. Neck Pain Condition . The single voter for dissent did not elect to submit a...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01538

    Original file (PD2012 01538.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I also reported mental health issues that were reported but not listed with my discharge. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the LBP...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00570

    Original file (PD2012-00570.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Three months prior to separation, the PEB adjudicated the mechanical LBP post MVA condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with application of the DoD Instruction 1332.39 and Application of the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) under spine rules applicable on or before 23 September 2002. At the MEB exam, 5 months before separation, the CI reported pain‐“pains that radiate down the leg from back pains” on the DD 2807 without elaboration in the NARSUM. Service...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00881

    Original file (PD2012 00881.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    5299-5295Chronic Low Back Pain, Myofascial5010-529220%20030203 An urgent care treatment note dated 21 September 2001 (6 months prior to separation) noted muscle spasm, with significantly increased pain and “60% of expected range of motion.” On 1October 2001, his commander endorsed that the CI was not fit for continued service due to the duty limitations secondary to his back injury.At the MEB exam, 3 months prior to separation, the CI reported pain in the right lower lumbar region,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00078

    Original file (PD2013 00078.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was evaluated for reported symptoms of paresthesias of the right upper extremity, but cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on 9 January 2001 did not show spinal canal stenosis or nerve encroachment and nerve conduction studies on 13 April 2001 did not show any evidence of radicuolpathy.The CI was involved in another MVA on 26 June 2001 and was seen in the ER for “right shoulder, neck and low back pain;” the exam noted only right trapezius muscle tenderness, no spinal tenderness,...